Dairy new "Zhunsheng Zheng," highlights the recipients of much of the production conditions of safety requirements, increase the threshold for self-test products are safe to install a security door. However, this road would ever be anti-theft security door? We leave "the ultimate realization of the safety of dairy products" in the end how far?

  After a resurgence of melamine milk powder, infant milk "hormone door" after the accident and a series of security crisis, the Government has finally determined to clean up dairy industry.

  Recently, the State Administration of Quality Supervision issued the "infant formula milk powder production and review of permit conditions Conditions (2010 Edition)" and "conditions of production dairy permits review of rules (2010 edition)" and demanded 12 dairy companies in 2010 May 31, must re-apply for production permits, and by March next year, the company did not receive permits will be ordered to withdraw from the market.

  2006 version of the review of the relative details of the new regulations issued by the dairy industry significantly increased the access threshold. Review the new regulations increased the number of regular review of key projects, particularly those that require manufacturers of infant formula milk powder with the appropriate testing equipment, on protein, food additives, melamine and other indicators of self-test 64. The melamine milk powder for the revival of the phenomenon occurs, the new regulations require companies purchased raw milk and raw materials for milk and test each batch of factory-finished products, while companies must test items associated with melamine testing equipment and capability, shall not be entrusted to test.

  There is no doubt that the new Dairy "Zhunsheng Zheng," highlights the recipients of much of the production conditions of safety requirements, increase the threshold for self-test products are safe to install a security door. However, this road would ever be anti-theft security door? We leave "the ultimate realization of the safety of dairy products" in the end how far?

  Since the outbreak of a series of food safety before the crisis, companies often have to "state does not provide for detection of related projects" as the rhetoric acquittal, the state inspection program in the country after the increase, but also with the new "Zhunsheng Zheng," to further Plugging the excuse business. However, companies have a self-test capability, just to solve the "can test" the problem.

  According to the responsible person said that the detection of melamine in liquid chromatography equipment, the price of imports nearly 40 million cost of testing a sample of 300 yuan, of which one is the detection reagents and other expenses to 100 yuan. Therefore, in accordance with the review of the requirements of the new rules every batch of raw materials and finished products for melamine testing, then, the dairy enterprises need to purchase equipment and increase the number of daily operations in the input. In addition to a large number of instruments, reagents and personnel with a substantial increase in the cost, I also learned that the test of time is also used to enable enterprises to headache, is a fast selling dairy products, fresh and have to rush to fast, but why, which do not seq.

  Thus, another problem is on the table. In front of a huge conflict of interest, have the ability to self-test of the enterprises will not really accordance with the provisions of each batch of raw materials and finished products are the detection of the 64 indicators? The heavy pressure of a question mark in people's hearts. Historical experience tells us that fame and wealth management organization for the purpose of interest is always preferred.

  "Shall not be entrusted to test" is precisely contrary to the provisions of the principle of third-party supervision, but also committed "to the players when the referee," the taboo, very dangerous! Was supposed to be strongly enhanced third-party testing, even in the New Deal was put aside, Taibuyinggai! delivery of public oversight responsibilities by monitoring the operators in themselves, proof of compliance by their own, almost a bit like giving up supervised. This management style is definitely in the field of security controls "on the first of its kind."

  Information, "can test" does not mean "will test", even if the enterprise configuration Qi testing equipment, reagents, and other professionals, who can stand up for their compliance report issued by the result s safe? Their own to their own label affixed to another qualified How much convincing? consumer, you feel you trust them? Anyway, I believe, but